Analysis of the Application of the Integrated Catastrophe Risk Model Method for the Flood Insurance Program

https://doi.org/10.47194/ijgor.v3i4.188

Authors

  • Nur Afifah Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor, Indonesia
  • Khafsah Joebaedi Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Scinces, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Iqbal Al-Banna Ismail Netherlands Maritime Institute of Technology, Malaysia

Keywords:

flood risk, Integrated Catastrophe Risk Model, loss-sharing program

Abstract

As the flood rises continue to grow, well-designed insurance programs are becoming an important instrument in flood risk management. One of the obstacles in the flood insurance program is the method used to calculate the premium value. This thesis refers to the Integrated Catastrophe Risk Model (ICRM) which consists of two probability events and stochastic optimization procedures with respect to observation of site-specific risk. The application of the model is illustrated in the study area simulation data. In this thesis, analysis of various aspects of trade-off, new ex-post variables, opportunity occurrence 1 and 2 and minimization of loss function. From the results of research based on these four aspects it can be concluded that the use of Integrated Catastrophe Risk Model method in the optimal flood insurance program.

References

Dastous, P. A., Nikiema, J., Maréchal, D., Racine, L., & Lacoursière, J. P. (2008). Risk management: All stakeholders must do their part. Journal of loss prevention in the process industries, 21(4), 367-373.

Hapsari, R. I., & Zenurianto, M. (2016). View of flood disaster management in Indonesia and the key solutions. American Journal of Engineering Research, 5(3), 140-151.

Harrison, D., T. Smersh, G., & Schwartz, A. (2001). Environmental determinants of housing prices: the impact of flood zone status. Journal of Real Estate Research, 21(1-2), 3-20.

Khan, A., Gupta, S., & Gupta, S. K. (2020). Multi-hazard disaster studies: Monitoring, detection, recovery, and management, based on emerging technologies and optimal techniques. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 47, 101642.

Marfai, M. A., Sekaranom, A. B., & Ward, P. (2015). Community responses and adaptation strategies toward flood hazard in Jakarta, Indonesia. Natural hazards, 75(2), 1127-1144.

Olaogbebikan, J. E., & Oloruntoba, R. (2019). Similarities between disaster supply chains and commercial supply chains: A SCM process view. Annals of Operations Research, 283(1), 517-542.

Padawangi, R., & Douglass, M. (2015). Water, water everywhere: Toward participatory solutions to chronic urban flooding in Jakarta. Pacific Affairs, 88(3), 517-550.

Prakash, B., & Viswanathan, V. (2019). Distributed cat modeling based agile framework for software development. SÄdhanÄ, 44(7), 1-11.

Raikes, J., Smith, T. F., Baldwin, C., & Henstra, D. (2021). Linking disaster risk reduction and human development. Climate Risk Management, 32, 100291.

Tsai, C. H., & Chen, C. W. (2010). An earthquake disaster management mechanism based on risk assessment information for the tourism industry-a case study from the island of Taiwan. Tourism Management, 31(4), 470-481.

Van Westen, C. J. (2013). Remote sensing and GIS for natural hazards assessment and disaster risk management. Treatise on geomorphology, 3, 259-298.

Published

2022-11-04